Nonprofit and Artist-Run Spaces

Mess Hall, Chicago

The information below is part of a series of guides that outline the pros and cons of various types of venues.


ABOUT: Traditionally called alternative spaces, these organizations began in the 1970s to expand the exhibition of artists’ work. These exhibition spaces are supported through public and private funding. They often have many opportunities for artists and do educational programming as well.

EXPECTATIONS: These spaces generally work with a range of artists from emerging to established. They often will show work that is risky, or experimental. Many support local and regional artists and usually pay an artist’s fee for showing work. Some take a small percentage of work sold. Usually a good place for emerging artists to begin showing work, as the staff is often supportive of artists.

PROS: Usually accessible to emerging artists, often pay artist’s fees, and often present programming that reflects community concerns. Many do group exhibitions that allow an artist to get started showing work. Most spaces encourage the submission of proposals from artists and curators. They often have an exhibition committee of your peers which makes decisions.

CONS: Often these spaces are financially challenged, and will sometimes request that the artist help to fund the exhibition.

RESEARCH: Be sure to understand the mission of the organization and see if your work fits their mandate. Contact the organization or visit the Web site to find out about submission guidelines.

RESOURCES: Art in America’s Annual Guide lists many nonprofits, national and regional gallery guides, and Web sites are good places to find out about these spaces. Also, you may contact your state arts council or commission. Check out your cities Cultural Affairs Department for information.